This Proportion200 Photoshop action will enlarge your images by 200%. I've tested it against all of the PAID competitors on the download page
(links included) and found it to give equal or superior results.
The method uses Staircase Interpolation.
We do a small amount of sharpening between each 10% incremental step to
keep things crisp. If you are using an old version (legacy) of
Photoshop, the action will work but calls for JPEG noise reduction to
eliminate artifacting. Just skip that step or do it in advance of the
action with a standalone filter --or not at all. Depends upon the
quality of the original image.
Free Upsize PS action download page
No
signup or registration is required. This is a great way to get low-cost
72dpi images suitable for 300dpi print. The higher the dpi resolution
of the original the better the results. I don't recommend passing the
image through Proportion200 more than three times --but you can be the
judge of when to stop. An ugly image is still going to be ugly when it's
enlarged --even more so. :)
My hat is off to my brother Brad Teare
who built this action to my specification and then agreed to generously
donate it to anyone who might benefit from it. Try it out!
Janice Campbell, of The Grid, collaborated with me to produce a comparison of commercial Blowup 3 Photoshop Plugin ($149 US) against Proportion200 (the freebie digital PS action enlarger).
Janice
supplied a digital camera photo of a perched butterfly. It's size is
1497 w x 1500 h pixels @300dpi. Janice said it was straight out of the
camera and just cropped to a square. No resizing, downsizing, or filters
were applied. She also provided a doubled image (200%) that had been
increased in Blowup (5.1MB JPEG). The final Proportion200 resize ended
up being 2.8MB file size JPEG.
I show the original here at 720 pixels wide so it fits on this page.
I sampled the exact same area from The Blowup enlargement and a Proportion200 enlargement (single-pass, no doctoring).
After examining the results, Janice did the experiment again but ran the image through "Dfine 2" from Google
part of a $149 filter plug-in package. Dfine 2 is a noise reduction
filter. Final image weight is 3.4MB JPEG. That sample is also included
for comparison. Read the captions, please, since they ended up in an odd
order.
Here are the results:
VISUALLY, I FIND the smoother gradient of Proportion200
more appealing on screen. From experience, I know that smooth gradients
show the artifacts of JPG compression in print. Also, smooth gradients
tend to band on digital presses. For that reason, I thought I'd like the
sharper, yet noisier Blowup 3 version. But upon printing, I found:
The Blowup 3 version on the left also blew up the noise in the original photo, which looks distracting in print. Though the Proportion200 version on the right did print the JPG artifacts like I thought, the banding wasn't so great as I thought.
Therefore, I recommend using the Proportion 200 and adding noise afterwards in Photoshop. And who can beat that at that price?
No comments:
Post a Comment